Now She Tell Us: Dr. Birx Says Covid-19 Vaccines Were Never ‘Going to Protect Against Infections.’

So just what then was their purpose?

From the Epoch Times:

‘I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection. And I think we overplayed the vaccines. And it made people then worry that it’s not going to protect against severe disease and hospitalization,’ Birx, the White House COVID-19 response coordinator under former President Donald Trump, said during an appearance on Fox News.

Not that long ago however, Dr. Birx said of the  Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines,

‘This is one of the most highly-effective vaccines we have in our infectious disease arsenal. And so that’s why I’m very enthusiastic about the vaccine.’

Yet she now says,

‘So, that’s why I’m saying, even if you’re vaccinated and boosted if you’re unvaccinated, right now, the key is testing and Paxlovid.’

Indeed, and wouldn’t that have  been the appropriate counsel two-and-a-half years ago, obviating lockdowns and closings of so many of our country’s businesses, particularly small ones, many never to re-open? Or the closings of our schools, thus our children losing two formative years, never to be made up, of their educations? Or the utterly ridiculous mask mandates, despite evidence appearing early on they offered little or no protection from COVID, just as we are now learning about the vaccines?

And for what? Basically a flu epidemic, potent, but hardly the worst the world has ever seen, e.g., the Spanish flu or, more recently, the Asian flu of the late ’60s (your correspondent when in his early teens caught that one–as did at least a third of his classmates. He has never had flu since, by the way. Anyone care to hazard a guess why that might be?).

Your humble servant Bickerstaff is disinclined to believe in conspiracy theories, but it does seem striking in an election year the severest lockdowns were those in states controlled by Democrats. This then provided the pretext for ignoring or eliminating safeguards to prevent election fraud, e.g., vote harvesting, mail-in ballots, multiple voting etc.

Also striking is concomitantly, an ageing political hack, a zero to begin with, now well into the negative numbers and obviously going gentle into that good night, could nevertheless reap 81 million votes, thus claiming the presidency.

Just coincidences? Who knows, but it is unnerving there isn’t a single Democrat in our present administration even remotely competent yet there are any number of them hugely proficient at making it easier to cheat at elections. It’s as if they don’t know how or want to do anything else.