No surprise, but still disappointing.

From the New York Sun:

Wikipedia’s Neutrality Under Fire as Studies Find Left-Leaning Bias.

A pair of damning reports allege that open-sourced Wikipedia — a non-profit organization that was built on the tenets of political and ideological neutrality — has increasingly displayed bias favoring the left and progressive issues within its content.

Read the whole thing (link above).

The shame of Wikipedia was its original promise of well-written, scholarly accounts that were as neutral as possible, making it a valuable resource given the leftward bias of virtually all media organs.  That is no longer the case; its editorial staffers have over the years transformed Wikipedia from neutral to the left, making it no more useful than the New York Times and kin (Scientific American and National Geographic have become little more socialist propaganda journals).

On non-topical subjects, Wikipedia is still invaluable as a one-step factual resource. This blogger, who writes professionally on classical music is glad to have it available for looking up forgotten details about a piece of music, or biographical information on composers. On other matters however, and those about certain artists involved in controversy, Wikipedia is becoming increasingly useless.

What a pity. Wikipedia in its  present state is further proof that everything the left touchs dies.

Requiescat in pace, Wikipedia.